Deciding for a new Nikon D90 or a D300 seems like a tough decision for some folks when buying a new DSLR. These two cameras are quite different and from each other being the Nikon D300 (IMHO) a more professional oriented camera. But does this means that your pictures will be professional when compared to a Nikon D90? If you are new to the DSLR world, this could be a misconception. A lot of new Nikon users are willing to put the dough in a camera that will do little to their photography if they lack the proper knowledge and most important, the basics of photography. So if one things that getting a D300 (or a D3 for that matter) and will be getting a magic wand in return, we are wrong. Actually, a D300 is a very complex camera features wise for I would dare to say 7 out of 10 people I have seen and spent time with them in photo shoots.
Lots of colleagues and friends were amazed when I decided to go the Nikon D90 route instead of the D300. While the D300 seemed like *my* obvious choice, I already had a Nikon D200. It is a robust weather sealed camera that will produce outstanding pictures for years to come. It’s weakness? Digital noise from ISO 800 and up. So in my case instead of going after a D300 for better noise performance, I opted for the Nikon D90 instead. I’m not saying that you’ll be wrongfully served with a D300 or better served by a D90. Do a research on what you like to shoot, your style and other important factors before opening you wallet. Most of the time after making your own reality check, you will have a better idea of what you really need instead of what you really want.

The secret is in the glass
There is a common tendency of wanting the latest and greatest without giving much consideration to what’s really important, the glass, they eyes of your camera. This is my respectful opinion, but buying lets say a D300 with a Nikkor 18-200 AF-S VR lens will not give you better pictures under normal use than the same lens used on a Nikon D40x. Actually, I have on my desk a big pile of Nikon brochures and very notable is the fact that the pictures on the D40x’s brochure, were taken for the most part with a Nikkor 17-55 AF-S F/2.8. Build a system around your lenses and not around your cameras. Cameras will be replaced in less than 2 years, but I have 20+ years old lenses doing great all this time. Your lenses will hold their value a lot better than a camera would. Have you seen the prices of a coveted Nikon D2Xs lately? Technology wont wait for us, our glass will follow us.
Be honest with yourself, if you don’t need 8 FPS and all the bells and whistles, why not settle for a more humble camera body and put the extra resources and budget on the best glass you can afford. That’s exactly what I do and my clients and editors are very happy with the crisp sharp files from my cameras. A D300 with a 18-200 or a D90 with a 17-55 AF-S? Nothing wrong with the 18-200, but no thanks, I rather work with the later set up.
Would you like to discuss this in our forums? Join in today and start a thread.